Navigating the Terrain: GPT's Journey into Malware Analysis

In the realm of technology, GPT has emerged as a transformative force, often regarded as a miraculous tool in the current tech cycle. Skeptics question its true intelligence, drawing parallels to trendy buzzwords like NFTs and blockchains. However, those who have delved into the capabilities of GPT understand its profound impact, turning week-long projects into a matter of hours. Amidst the hype and skepticism lies a nuanced reality—one that we explored through practical tests, challenging GPT with the intricate task of malware analysis.

GPT's Natural Strengths

GPT's prowess lies in its verbal acuity, a verbal thinker that excels in deciding the most fitting words and their placement. This linguistic strength grants GPT access to an extensive cheat sheet of human knowledge. If a pertinent answer exists in its training data, GPT can reproduce it with uncanny accuracy. For instance, when presented with a GandCrab report(GradCrab ransomware works to encrypt a victim's files and demands ransom payment in order to regain access to their data. GandCrab targets consumers and businesses with PCs running Microsoft Windows), GPT effortlessly recalled information and even demonstrated the ability to perform a Google Scholar search

Sentence Completion

GPT is a totally verbal thinker. Its entire power is predicated on an outstanding capability to decide what’s the most appropriate word to put, and where, in its response. This is one of the most important things to understand about GPT — a lot of the behavior that we will cover later is, in a sense, downstream from this one property.One of the immediate implications of this is that GPT has access to a huge latent cheat sheet. If someone, at any point in history, has answered the actual question being asked and this answer has made it into GPT’s training data, GPT exhibits an uncanny ability to reproduce the answer.

Big Picture Summaries

Through its web of word associations, GPT has a keen grasp of grammar and of the difference between key vs. ancillary facts. As a result, one of the tasks where GPT can be trusted to perform most reliably is producing “a summary of the big picture” when given input which is too large for comfort for human consumption. For example, when given part of a very lengthy API call log produced by a piece of malware and asked to summarize the log, GPT produced the below useful output:

In the realm of technology, GPT has emerged as a transformative force, often regarded as a miraculous tool in the current tech cycle. Skeptics question its true intelligence, drawing parallels to trendy buzzwords like NFTs and blockchains. However, those who have delved into the capabilities of GPT understand its profound impact, turning week-long projects into a matter of hours. Amidst the hype and skepticism lies a nuanced reality—one that we explored through practical tests, challenging GPT with the intricate task of malware analysis.

The malware seems to be heavily interacting with Windows API and doing various operations such as file operations, memory management, privilege escalation, loading libraries, and notably cryptography-related operations.

Gap Between Knowledge and Action

However, a notable challenge emerges—a gap between knowledge and action, reminiscent of Richard Feynman's critique of students who memorized without understanding. This echoes in GPT's encounters with malware analysis tasks, where its struggles seem rooted in comprehending the essence of information. The dichotomy between having access to information and comprehending its meaning poses challenges in tasks requiring a deeper understanding of context.

Typical Challenges in Malware Analysis

The complexity of malware analysis unveils challenges for GPT. When tasked with triage—identifying benign or malicious binaries—GPT exhibited limitations.

As it turned out, seeing GPT deal with this apparently simple task already produced a wealth of insight regarding its ability to reason in this domain.

While GPT is an artificial construct, many of the challenges one encounters when applying GPT to the domain of malware analysis seem strangely human on GPT’s part. We collected many examples of GPT running into these challenges while attempting to deal with some task, and tried as much as possible to sort them into larger, more general categories. The result was the below list of 6 general principal obstacles:

• Memory Window Drift
• Gap between Knowledge and Action
• Logical Reasoning Ceiling
• Detachment from Expertise
• Goal Orientation
• Spatial Blindness

Overcoming Challenges

Acknowledging these challenges, we sought hacks and mitigations to elevate GPT's capabilities in malware analysis. A proof of concept, involving a heavily engineered prompt, showcased improvements in GPT's ability to guide an analyst during triage.

Conclusion

GPT's journey into malware analysis illuminates its natural strengths and the challenges it faces in reasoning within this domain. While its verbal acuity and vast knowledge repository are undeniable assets, the gap between knowledge and action presents hurdles. The exploration of hacks and mitigations signifies ongoing efforts to enhance GPT's applicability in complex tasks, opening avenues for future advancements in the synergy between artificial intelligence and cybersecurity.