Advertisment

WAN: Why Be Pound-foolish?

author-image
Voice&Data Bureau
New Update

Of late, some awareness has come about on the need to segregate private WAN
networks containing company databases and public networks such as the Internet.
However, there is still a lot of confusion on what a private network is, and why
it is required despite the existence of various public networks.

Advertisment

Cellular and WLL networks like GSM, GPRS and CDMA are public networks and
have access to other public networks like PSTN and ISDN and the routed IP
networks of telcos and ISPs. Hence these cannot be used in building real private
networks (RPNs).

RPNs are formed by connecting company locations through dedicated
point-to-point leased lines, in star or mesh/star topologies, and routed through
router-like devices. These may be either pure data networks (RPDNs) or
integrated real private networks (IRPNs). All RPNs are totally secure, as the
point-to-point leased lines between company premises deny physical access to
company outsiders.

Advertisment

Path redundancies in RPNs have to be achieved by providing additional leased
lines in star topologies, or alternative paths in mesh topologies. In fact, RPNs
should not be backed up by any public domain connections like ISDN, PSTN, PDN or
VPN, and VSAT systems. Backup through public or shared domain connections
defeats the very purpose of having an RPN, as this exposes the network to the
public domain access, and to professional hackers.

Pure data RPNs or RPDNs add to a company’s cost, as the existing STD/ISD/local
PSTN communications costs between company locations continue.

IRPNs not only provide a secure communications backbone for the WAN, but also
take care of a company’s total inter-locational communications, in the form of
speech and fax, in addition to data. Once an IRPN is established, the inter-locational
STD/ISD communications are eliminated.

Advertisment

Prevailing IRPN technologies are the VoIP technology, and the new and
patented PVDTN technology.

The principle difference in the two technologies is that

Advertisment

n In VoIP, speech communications
is through voice packets queuing with data packets in the routed IP WAN, calling
for large bandwidth leased lines in the WAN for acceptable or toll quality
(normal telephone like) speech. The speech communications in the LAN could be
either through circuit switching and normal telephone distribution, like an EPAX
system, or packet switched through IP telephones over the LAN. The latter is
more expensive.

n In PVDTN, the speech and fax
communication is circuit switched end-to-end through the LAN and WAN,
facilitating toll-quality speech over low-bandwidth digital or even analog
leased lines. Data communications are always packet switched through fixed data
pipes forming a routed IP WAN, or through switched data pipes formed by circuit
switching between locations.

The lower bandwidth leased line requirements of PVDTN produces very low
operating costs, about one-third of a VoIP network with the same connectivity.
This enables companies to reduce their existing communications costs by 40—60
percent, by eliminating the STD and ISD communications expenses between
locations.

Advertisment

Although VoIP networks also eliminate STD/ISD communications between
locations, the overall costs of companies increase due to an increase in
operating costs of the network, especially when toll quality speech is a must.

Thus, the two best ways of building your WAN is either a routed IP RPDN, or
through an IRPN using the PVDTN technology, which is a mixture of routed IP WAN,
and circuit switched voice and fax communication. Due the reducing costs of long
distance call charges, VoIP is not a cost effective option, due to its high
annual operating cost.

The next question is: how does a company interact with the information
highway–the Internet.

Advertisment

Many a company CIOs ask the question, and very rightly so: "How can any
company afford to isolate itself from the Internet, in today’s scenario of
e-commerce?" The answer is, by having a secure private internal data
WAN/LAN.

To facilitate the availability of up-to-date publishable information about
the company on the Internet; to facilitate the inputs from clients, vendors, and
company officers in the field, through interactive screens on company Web pages,
or through e-mail; or access to information required by field officers for
dealing with their clients, a secure transfer system (STS) has been devised,
which facilitates information exchange back and forth between the public
Internet and the private company LAN/WAN, at major company locations, without
impairing the security of the private LAN/WAN. The STS denies access to the
company private LAN/WAN from the public domain networks like Internet, PSTN,
ISDN, PDN, ISP/VPN.

Another logical question being asked by CIOs is: "If access to the
Internet is denied to private company LAN/WAN, how does one provide Internet
browsing facilities to employees in the office premises or outside?" This
issue can be addressed cost effectively. The additional costs of extending the
Internet LAN to those employees who need to browse the Internet during working
hours from their own work stations is insignificant compared to the costs that
the company would incur if its databases were damaged by hackers.

Advertisment

The usage of integrated information systems like SAP and Baan by companies to
run their day-to-day businesses is increasing.

The increasing dependence on such computerized data makes it imperative to
have high levels of security. This is currently non-existent in the prevailing
methods of connectivity being practiced, primarily due to the lack of awareness
of the implications of such connectivity, by those who are providing them and
those who are accepting them.

PK Mitra, managing director, MIDAS Automation & Telecommunications

Advertisment